Page 60 - Htain Manual
P. 60

With a binary scale, people may prefer to be alive or not; or have a disease or not; but

               that is the extent to which their preferences may be known. A scale with ordinal properties is

               one where the preferences or choices are ranked in some set increasing or decreasing order.

               The  catch  however  is  that  we  know that the preferences  are ranked  by some  difference
               between themselves, but not by how much. A cardinal scale eliminates that as it can have

               either interval or ratio properties. Now another issue arises that the interval would mean that

               equal intervals do exist between the preferences but we cannot make any assumptions about
               the absolute size of these preferences. An example of this is that on a scale that has numbers

               10, 20, 30 ad 40; we know there exists a specific interval of 10 points but that does not clear

               the  picture  of  the  absolute  change  in  this  interval  –  is  the  change  of  10  arithmetic  or

               exponential, etc. Therefore, it is recommended to use ratio scales as these have a true zero

               point and are able to compare the size of numbers rather than just the size of the change.

                       Thirdly,  the  health  measure  should  be  able  to  reflect  the  preferences,  either  of

               individual patients or of the public. Another set of characteristics derived from principles of

               psychometrics are summarized below:

                   1.  Reliability: how much can the measure produce repeated results from an unchanged

                       population with minimum random error?

                   2.  Validity: to what extent does the measure capture what it aims to quantify. It may be

                       in the form of content validity (the appropriateness of items within a tool) or construct

                       validity (extent to which results correlate with other indicators, measures or concepts
                       of interest).

                   3.  Practicality: the measure should be acceptable to respondents and ethics committees

                       as well as being easy to administer, score and interpret findings.
                   4.  Responsiveness: a measure should be able to detect clinically and socially meaningful

                       changes in the health status over time. In most cases an ‘effect size’ is calculated,

                       which  is  the  difference  between  the  mean  baselines  and  mean  follow-up  scores

                       divided by the standard deviation of the baseline scores.

                       Now coming to the outcomes of concern (apart from PROs) to us while conducting an
               HTA or an economic evaluation. Quality adjusted life years (QALYs), disability adjusted life

               years (DALYs) and life years gained (LYG) are all common outcome measures in economic

               evaluations of health interventions. While LYG is a pure measure of mortality, QALYs and


                                                           48
   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65